No wonder I don't like British electronics
(Lucas) in our aircraft! Scary, aren't they!?
Cap'n. Bob
'61 :{)
Received: from smtpin-101-6.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.40) by
storefull-157.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2001
19:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtpin-101-6.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) id
6465EFF; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: pilotrob@webtv.net
Received: from mailbag.com (glacier.binc.net [205.173.176.10]) by
smtpin-101-6.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP id
96C8B125 for <PilotRob@webtv.net>; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:32:35 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nosimport.mailbag.com (msn-10-37.dial.binc.net
[64.73.5.37]) by mailbag.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id
f6P2WY925963; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:32:34 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:25:28 -0500
To: PilotRob@webtv.net (Robert E. Shlafer)
From "Peter C." <nosimport at mailbag.com>
Subject: Re: 1098 rebuild
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
References: <WEricars@aol.com's message of Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:57:58
EDT>
At 08:40 PM 7/24/2001, Robert E. Shlafer wrote:
>Wasn't the early 1098 the cc and the later
>wider width bearing model the cg?
>Cap'n. Bob
> '61 :{)
======
Makes sense, doesn't it, what with the alphabet and all; ergo, no, t'other
way round.
Peter C
I ain't 'ED yet!
|