| To: | David Riker <davriker@pacbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: clutch fork |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:13:40 -0400 |
| Cc: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
| References: | <85256A84.005E4EA9.00@test.markivoe.com> <3B49EB8C.237F1063@brit.ca> <038a01c108e6$8bb9e280$8ea7fed8@mlupynec> <3B4A7B2A.BD5AC615@brit.ca> <04c401c10950$5379a800$8ea7fed8@mlupynec> <001101c10958$97bd6b70$7364640a@internal.vgl.ucdavis.edu> <005101c109bd$1126a9e0$48fefea9@pavilion> |
Hello David, Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 11:53:37 PM, you wrote: DR> Every car I've driven where I knew it was a cable clutch seemed to take a DR> lot more pressure to disengage the clutch. On my bad knee, it makes driving DR> those cars unenjoyable. I have a POS 89 Nissan that has a cable clutch. It requires much less pressure than my midget. When I go from the Midget to the Nissan for the first couple of miles I nearly put the clutch pedal through the floor. As for how well it works, 11 years, 125K miles, no clutches, no cables. Seems to work well. The Nissan is a steaming pile, IMHO. -- Best regards, Bill mailto:w.gilroy@verizon.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Overheating (Fwd: downflow vs. cross flow, fan position, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Side draft weber manifold FS, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: clutch fork, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Weber issues, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |