Dear concerned,
Charley and Peggy are correct. It is "concourse condition" [sic] that the
seller was trying to convey in his text. I personally know the seller and
the car. Both are concours in my humble opinion.
Dave@Taos Garage Annex in Albuquerque
59 AH :{) 54 BN1
Click below for webpage and mopeds:
http://ibelong.koz.com/ibn/ignore?MIval=cge&GID=01039011420945892954943146
----- Original Message -----
From "Brad Fornal" <toyman at digitex.net>
To: "Charley & Peggy Robinson" <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Cc: <Ajhsys@aol.com>; <Bushwacker4@prodigy.net>; <Spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: "Concours" Restoration
> That is why we are all here Charlie, to learn from each other!! I made
the
> mistake of making my first question to the list the Morris vs. B.L. thread
> (check the archives if you want on that one). Man, did I see a bit of a
> conversation on that score <G>. Anyway, you should never hesitate to ask a
> question, because more often than not, someone else will learn from the
> answers that you receive. Brad
>
> Charley & Peggy Robinson wrote:
>
> > Shux, I didn't read the text, just looked at the pic. So I went back
> > and looked again. The guy said "restored to concours _condition_", not
> > that it was a concours example. Seems fair enuff to me, if you read it
> > carefully. Don't know if the seller was trying to mislead or not, can't
> > get into his head.
> >
> > Guess I shouldn't have asked since I don't know jack about Sprites.
> > Er, well I guess that's why I _did ask_.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > CR
>
>
|