spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was Spridgetstock 2001 now rain

To: Patricia Sauthoff <Patricia.Sauthoff@blvdmedia.com>
Subject: Re: was Spridgetstock 2001 now rain
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:06:51 -0500
Cc: Spridgets <Spridgets@autox.team.net>
References: <1FB74933B3D9D311ACBB006097DC08BF2B13C3@DVR_MAIL>
YEAH!!! Oy Vay My Son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Patricia Sauthoff wrote:

> >>I think it was the Medicine man in some tribes and the        Shaman in
> some others.<<
>
> apples to apples my friend.  the difference is essentially that of a priest
> and a rabbi!
>
> Patricia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent J. Miller [mailto:Bushwacker4@prodigy.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 6:38 PM
> To: Spridgets
> Subject: Fw: Spridgetstock 2001
>
> Witches can't cast spells that are completely nice in nature. Elizabeth
> could probably cause it to rain frogs or something but not just plain old
> rain. To get the rain you would have to take whatever comes with it. Since
> Elizabeth is so nice, she just doesn't want to cause anybody any
> inconvenience with the frogs or whatnot.
>
> Kent
> PS - not all Indians can summon the rain. I think it was the Medicine man in
> some tribes and the Shaman in some others.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brad Fornal <toyman@digitex.net>
> To: <DLancer7676@cs.com>
> Cc: <fisher@hctc.net>; <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>;
> <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Spridgetstock 2001
>
> > Everybody knows that is the Indians job.................
> >
> > DLancer7676@cs.com wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 8/21/2000 10:51:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > > fisher@hctc.net writes:
> > >
> > > << still have a burn ban in force by then (boy I really hope we get some
> > >  > >> rain before then). >>
> > >
> > > Elizabeth:
> > >
> > > Cannot a witch conjur up a spell of rain at will?  8^)
> > >
> > > --David c.
> >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>