That is what I thought, I just didn't want to be the one to say it. <LOL>
At 05:57 PM 2/9/00 -0500, Graziano, Michael wrote:
>Macy's address doesn't include "psycha" b/c he's a doctor. It's included
>b/c he's a permanent out-patient. They decided he was there enough to
>warrant an email address.
>
>You of course heard that he drives around with no top and a 20 foot
>phycadelic scarf throughout the Philadelphia year..... ;)
>
>Mike
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David [SMTP:bohler@hooked.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 5:33 PM
>> To: boxweed@thebest.net; macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu
>> Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
>> Subject: Re: larry's
>>
>> Frankly <G> (couldn't resist that one)--
>> It does seem there are quite a few Larrys -- also a bunch of Davids --
>> which I find interesting -- when my husband (rarely) responds to the list
>> he could use either name because he goes by Dave (middle name David) but
>> he
>> could go by Larry since his first name is Lawrence -- and what, you ask,
>> is
>> the point of this ......
>> beats me. Then there are the Ricks - "Wrong Way Rick" ....... etc.
>> I find some of the addresses interesting also--"boxweed" is pretty cool -
>> and notice LarryMacy's address...... he is probably analyzing the whole
>> bunch.
>> <unsigned> ;o)
>
>This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
>confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
>confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
>If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
>copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
>sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
>print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
>recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
>the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
>views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
>where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
>them to be the views of any such entity.
>
>
>
>
|