spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Midget Mk./Model Designations

To: <KGROWLER@aol.com>, "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Midget Mk./Model Designations
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:18:58 -0500
Well I would be a fool if I said I didn't learn something everyday. 
Thanks for the clarification. Now I have to go look at my owners manual 
for my 78.

Thanks

Larry

At this exact moment in time 2/3/00 4:05 PM, KGROWLER@aol.com made the 
profound statement:

>Larry Macy wrote:
>
><<<Gotta agree, it is my understanding that the RB Midgets have no MK 
>designation. Although Mk IV would be correct if there were one.
>
>Larry>>>
>
>I have to respectfully disagree. The Mk. III designation carried to the end 
>as evidenced by the Mk. III designation still used on the title page of the 
>1979 Midget Owners Manual. Also by the titling of the Leyland parts book - 
>Mk. 2 and Mk. 3 Midget - which covered up to the end. The only Mk. IV was 
>the 
>Sprite equivalent of the Mk. III Midget. The BMIHT seems to have skirted the 
>issue on the Heritage certificate I have on my '79 - it is just called a 
>Midget 1500.
>
>Kim Tonry
>Downers Grove, IL, USA
>


Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.
macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu
System Administrator/Manager
Neuropsychiatry Section
Department of Psychiatry
University of Pennsylvania
3400 Spruce St. - 1015 Gates
Philadelphia, PA 19104

 Ask a question and you're a fool for three minutes; do not ask a 
question and you're a fool for the rest of your life. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>