Hey, I've met him... didn't look 57....
(didn't look like he caught any fish either.)
peterc
At 04:10 PM 10/28/1999 , Lancer7676@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 10/25/99 4:17:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu writes:
>
><< So at a minimum you are
> 40. But a guess says more. >>
>
>Good guess, Larry--Not meaning to start a guessathon about my age here--just
>a smartass comment that age isn't really that important and how in the heck
>did we ever get on that topic??? Actually , I am 57, and my cars are not
>near as old as I am. But in lots of ways I am younger than younger folk,
>especially teenagers--witnessed when I lead a group of them into the
>backcountry, LOL.
>
>---David C.
|