To: | hubbard@idir.net, spridgets@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Bugeye Period Performance Tune |
From: | Daniel1312@aol.com |
Date: | Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:01:51 EST |
Reply-to: | Daniel1312@aol.com |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
In a message dated 26/2/1999 3:28:48PM, hubbard@idir.net writes: << I just wonder if it is any substitute for dropping in a 1275 engine, 5 speed etc >> The problem is that neither the Shorrock or Judson like high rpm and ultimately that restricts the amount of power that can be developed. However, for a fast road Spridget a well put together blown 948 ought to give a 286 cammed well put together 1275 a run for its money. The 948 would benefit from a decent head job, mild cam (has to be for the blower to work effectively) and stuff like that. Daniel1312 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Radiator/Electric Fan, Daniel1312 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Halogen Head lights?, Daniel1312 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Bugeye Period Performance Tune, GMari58175 |
Next by Thread: | RE: Bugeye Period Performance Tune, Wm. Severin Thompson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |