| To: | Pete Phillips <phillipp@cfw.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Roadster vs Convertible terminology |
| From: | Bob Brown <rcbrown@lucent.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:27:03 -0600 |
| Cc: | spridgets@triumph.cs.utah.edu |
| Organization: | Lucent Technologies |
| Original-cc: | spridgets@triumph.cs.utah.edu |
| References: | <199901100906_MC2-661C-382C@compuserve.com> <3698B075.65FE@cfw.com> |
| Reply-to: | Bob Brown <rcbrown@lucent.com> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
This might have been before Subaru wrote the correct definition! Sorry, Swiftjustice, couldn't help my self! Pete Phillips wrote: > > In years past I always was told that a roadster was a two seat, open > car, with removable side curtains, and the convertable had roll up > windows. In 1940 Ford made a 40 ford roadster with side curtains, and a > convertable with roll up windows. That was the only difference. > > Pete Phillips > 61 Bugeye |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Naming your car, Ulix Goettsch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | First drive of the year, Theo Neeskens |
| Previous by Thread: | Roadster vs Convertible terminology, Pete Phillips |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Roadster vs Convertible terminology, Robert Duquette |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |