To: | "'Mike Gigante'" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Radiator Stuff |
From: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:09:19 -0800 |
Cc: | "spridgets@Autox.Team.Net" <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net> |
Reply-to: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
>"Or we could end up with some calculus to describe theoretical >performance. Some might remember this *did* happen once >when the discussion was about thermostat removal and whether >faster flow was better than slower flow." >Mike" This would be a good time for an archive. Mike Said: >" Since the factory changed over to the crossflow for later models, presumably they > thought there'd be some improvement." Not necessarily true. probably easier and cheaper to produce and fit crossflows. A downflow has a few more parts and looks more complex to make. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante |
Next by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |