Good catch. Those are '90 wheels.
91's had the 16' slicers
dave
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of leighsm
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:32 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 89 SHO F/S - nice 54k
It might be an 89, but those wheels are from an 90 or 91. They are most
definately not 89 wheels, At least not like the ones I had on mine. Lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>
To: "'Mark Nunnally'" <marknunnally@alltel.net>;
<shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] 89 SHO F/S - nice 54k
> Story doesnt quite hold. Seller says it was in the garage 'till 2003
> but according to Carfax, it was driven 2,000 or 3,000 per year before
> that and had 30,000 miles in 2003.
>
> Also, ht mileage isn't consistent. Went from 12,000 miles in 1997 to
> 9,000 miles in 1998. Looks like a decent car but buyer beware.
>
>
> Paul L Fisher
>
> Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com
> Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Mark Nunnally
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:20 AM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] 89 SHO F/S - nice 54k
>
> Looks pretty good, GA car
>
> http://tinyurl.com/h9g7
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.9/416 - Release Date:
8/10/2006
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
|