To: | "Tim ." <tims_datsun_stuff@outlook.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Shop-talk] Classic car insurance tangents |
From: | Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:32:07 -0500 |
Cc: | Shop Talk <shop-talk@autox.team.net> |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
References: | <CY1PR13MB050362EB8DFAEAB92B72F458B4DA0@CY1PR13MB0503.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Tim . <tims_datsun_stuff@outlook.com> wrote: > > First a question: How was your vehicle's value decided? Hagerty has an agreed-on value, at least for me. > Well, because my > daughter didn't have her own car, grundy denied me coverage stating "the > teen driver might take the Roadster for a drive because she didn't have her > own car". (<-----this is almost verbatim) That's how you can get a classic car, agreed-on value policy for your car at a fraction of what your regular car insurance would cost. Because even though your kid is a good kid, someone else's isn't. And insurance is a pooled risk. Jeff Scarbrough Corrosion Acres, Ga. _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Shop-talk] Classic car insurance tangents, Tim . |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Shop-talk] The one tool we have never discussed here!, eric |
Previous by Thread: | [Shop-talk] Classic car insurance tangents, Tim . |
Next by Thread: | [Shop-talk] The one tool we have never discussed here!, eric |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |