| To: | shop-talk@autox.team.net, Matt <mbarre@juno.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Shop-talk] electrical question |
| From: | Randall <tr3driver@ca.rr.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:05:06 +0000 |
| Authentication-results: | cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=tr3driver@ca.rr.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=cnSeiTxgE1kA:10 a=NoAKp6exAAAA:8 a=SEBCRQsI3b_UsvCqExYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=B0cvAcWxpcAA:10 a=BPSfKMXmiYsA:10 a=KOrh491K8B87fFeLgJkoRw==:117 |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
| Sensitivity: | Normal |
---- Matt <mbarre@juno.com> wrote: > Is there > any reason to go 220 instead of 110 in this case? I don't know, but I would check the specifications carefully. For the MIG welders that are rated to run on either 110v or 220v, there is usually a performance penalty on 110v. Frequently you can't use the highest output current setting, and the duty cycle is reduced from what it would be on 220v even on lower current settings. But maybe that wouldn't matter, for what you are doing. Randall _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] electrical question, Doug Braun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] electrical question, Mike Rambour |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] electrical question, Doug Braun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] electrical question, Mike Rambour |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |