oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR

To: <miq@teleport.com>, <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR
From: "Dave Cunningham" <djcvjc@riconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:07:06 -0500
I am all for it.

I am restoring a 55 GMC and the motor portion I have spent a lot of time and
money to make it run perfect and it will be maintained more then most of the
new junk on the road. I don't want my right to have and drive a old vehicle
taken away by some politicians.

Thanks Miq

Dave Cunningham
55 GMC

-----Original Message-----
From: miq@teleport.com <miq@teleport.com>
To: oletrucks@autox.team.net <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Date: Saturday, March 20, 1999 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR


>MarkNoakes@aol.com says:
>>
>> This is definitely a serious change in the approach to "clunker" laws and
>> definitely something we can't ignore--either from the legal side or from
the
>> technical "how much emissions our trucks put out" side.  Notice that this
is
>> much more insidious than the TX law that someone else put on the list
>> recently.  Even though this new approach is starting in Oregon, expect it
to
>> spread to other states.
>
>
>I've been giving this some thought, and came up with an idea.  Please allow
>me some indulgence here.  While I gladly administer the list and keep it
>running for purely selfless reasons, I'd like to think that having a part
>in organized 540 members world wide interested in these oletrucks entitles
>me to a perk from time to time.  This is one of those times.
>
>I'd like to put up a draft letter to the list--others input is welcome, and
>then submit it to the legislation involved with this signed by all the
>members of the list (well their email addresses anyway).  What I would do
>is send the list the letter to be sent with a disclaimer on it reading:
>
> "Your silent acceptance of this letter forwards the list
> administrator the right to add your email to the signers as a class
> agreement.  If you do not wish to be a party to this stance, send
> a message to (miq@teleport.com) and I will remove your address from
> the list of signers when the letter is sent to the legislature."
>
>Obviously, the letter drafted and the list of signers would be available
>for other states fight in this issue.
>
>So I'd like to hear opinions on this.  Am I stepping over the line here?
>
>
>
>--
>__
>Miq Millman   miq@teleport.com
>Tualatin, OR
>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>