To: | "mgs@autox.team.net" <mgs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Mgs] MG GS |
From: | David Breneman via Mgs <mgs@autox.team.net> |
Date: | Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:59:51 +0000 (UTC) |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | mgs@autox.team.net |
References: | <E1aQLdZ-0000Yi-Dw@eta.look.ca> |
From: Barrie Robinson via Mgs <mgs@autox.team.net> > I would never ever buy one. What in Satan's domain has it got to do > with MG ?? ... > ...So why buy an MG> that is only labelled as an MG. What makes an automotive marque authentic? You could argue that the 1100 saloon and the 1960s Midget aren't "real" MGs, either. Does a ford need to be made in Dearborn to be a real Ford? Is a new Bentley not a real Bentley because the company is owned by VW? Is any Cadillac made by GM (since 1909) not authentic? _______________________________________________ Mgs@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/mharc@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] MG GS, Dan DiBiase via Mgs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Mgs] MG GS, Max Heim via Mgs |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] MG GS, Dan DiBiase via Mgs |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] MG GS, Max Heim via Mgs |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |