To: | "Stuart MacMillan" <macgroup@comcast.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Mgs] batteries: lead-acid vs Absorbed Glass Mat |
From: | "Simon Matthews" <simon.d.matthews@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:21:46 -0700 |
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Stuart MacMillan <macgroup@comcast.net> wrote: > AGM and Gel batteries have one advantage over flooded batteries, and that is > they will survive deep discharging (80%) many more times than a flooded > battery will. Who cares? Just buy a battery with a good warranty and return it for partial replacement if (when) the not so good-regulator on our LBCs causes the battery to die prematurely. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Mgs@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] batteries: lead-acid vs Absorbed Glass Mat, Paul Root |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Mgs] Looking for a rebuilt Zenith Stromberg...or a Weber DGV, MGALUVR |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] batteries: lead-acid vs Absorbed Glass Mat, Paul Root |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] batteries: lead-acid vs Absorbed Glass Mat, Paul Root |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |