mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: reply or cc?

To: MG Mailing List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: reply or cc?
From: Aaron Whiteman <aaronw@wsu.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:47:19 -0700
On Friday, August 2, 2002, at 04:13  PM, Kevin Smith wrote:

>   Thanks for the advice guys.  Reply to All, why didn't I think of that?
>
> I'm using the simple Mail program that ships with Mac OS X.  I've always
> found that it does everything I need it to.

And a fine program it is too.  I want a command line version though, so 
I can still read the mail that Mail.app grabbed when I ssh in...

> I once shook a magic 8-ball and the reply was "Outlook Not Good".  I've
> trusted its advice ever since. <grin>

heh.  that's good.  must remember.

Anyway, as a list manager some time in the past, I have always set up 
lists to work like the mgs list is currently set up.

There are many reasons for this, but the one that I consider important 
is this:

Mistakes happen.  It is much easier to apologize to one person for 
sending something privately when you meant to send it publicly than 
vice-versa.

Regarding this, when I set up mailing lists at my previous employer, the 
people on the list were very happy (almost elated) that replies went to 
sender, not to the list.  They were sick of all the "me too" messages 
that they got all the time  whenever anybody posted.

The secondary is that it makes a person _think_ before just immediately 
hitting reply and firing off a message.  Thinking is good.  :)

--
Aaron Whiteman -- Thoughts of graduation apply.
  My opinions are mine and do not reflect the views of the University.
http://www.wsu.edu/~aaronpw/MG/
'75 B

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>