To: | Steve Shoyer <Steve@shoyer.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: non-LBC (Volvo) question: Why does a bad thermostat = new engine? |
From: | Dan DiBiase <dibiase@home.com> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:28:04 -0500 |
Steve, I bvote for trying to get Volvo to pick up the entire cost. As was previously stated, you certainly made them aware of the issue at 49,500, and obviously the engine was in the same state then as it is now. They ought to do the right thing, and I would bet, after a little discussion, they will.... Dan D 76 MGB Tourer Former 1982 Volvo Turbo Sedan Owner (I miss it...) |
Previous by Date: | RE: [Re: [Re: Poetry and Proper Name....]], Dodd, Kelvin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | The Right Oil,THANKS, runriver |
Previous by Thread: | Re: non-LBC (Volvo) question: Why does a bad thermostat = new engine?, Charles D. Sorkin |
Next by Thread: | Re: non-LBC (Volvo) question: Why does a bad thermostat = new engine?, James H. Nazarian, Ph.D. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |