Carol:
I knew you would have a smart answer like that. I'd say something like =
"if I weren't married..." ....hehe, but that definitely wouldn't be MG =
related would it? It would also mark me as one of inferior "quality"!=20
Thanks
Dan=20
----------
From: Carol
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 1997 5:19 PM
To: mgs4dave@warwick.net
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Double the message
Dave, at about noon on 10/16/97 I wrote, BUT forgot to send....
Re: double messages
In all cases of my receiving double messages in the last week or so I =
have
noticed the following:
1. The responder is replying to all which includes the list and the
original sender. If I write a message to Art via the list, and Art =
replies
using the "all" option in his mailer, I get the copy to me and the copy
that goes to the list. If the original sender is NOT subscribed to the
list, he/she will only receive the message with his/her name on =
it...Kapiche?
2. Several messages have actually been posted twice, but they had =
different
times.... like somebody sent them twice.
In either case, I have not been inundated with duplicate messages... =
only
the "logical" ones...=20
Wonder where this is coming from...
Am I confusing anybody yet? This is still the MG list, right??
Carol
The example you sent me below falls into #1 above... its' supposed to =
work
thata' way...!
At 02:13 PM 10/16/97 +0000, you wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:13:18 +0000
From: Dave Houser <mgs4dave@warwick.net>
Reply-To: mgs4dave@warwick.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
To: Carol <car@texas.net>
CC: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Double the message
>Carol,=20
>If the wisdom of the net is to be believed(and I am a believer), you
>will get this message twice, back to back because it is mailed to you
>personally and to you at mgs@autox.team.net.
>Let me know if in fact this does happen and no, I'm afraid you may not
>be blessed if you start seeing double :>)
>
>Cheers,
>Dave
>
>
|