no problem Mike, the misunderstanding might
be from the internet barrier, BUT I did QUOTE
YOUR words...
your efforts are HIGHLY admired by me and my family
(ps, thank you very much for taking my call awhile back
and offering intercooler insight :):)
as for JD using same pistons for 25 yrs, I couldnt
keep them for 2.5 passes...perhaps thats why I am
researching spending the few nickles I have the wisest
possible.....and using some relatively cheap electronics
might be something for our effort to aspire to......my son
of 8 and wife of around 18 think so, they have pushed me
to try to make the effort not go to waste, an 8 and 11 yr
old shouldnt know lean and detonation as well as they do
as for Dave D., my money isnt worth a crap, cuz the bastard wont
take any from me, he has saved me ABUNCH past few years but wont take a
dime....
something to the effect of , if he can "help someone go faster than
fairly fast on a sunny day, with enhanced safety" then thats what he
TRULY aspires to
Bonn. hasnt changed over the years in my eye, as long as anyone can
put something together and run for a timing slip.........
Joe :)
----- Original Message -----
From: Flowbench@aol.com
To: jkamo@rushmore.com ; gmc6power@earthlink.net ; land-speed@autox.team.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Technology
In a message dated 6/29/04 9:45:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
jkamo@rushmore.com writes:
no your NOT going 300 like clock work
in top fuel, top fuel uses as much data acq. as
the space shuttle
as far as "enjoy your traction control",
thats like me saying enjoy the nitrous you
use in gas class
Sorry you misunderstood what I ment. But I'm farly sure the Shuttle has a
touch more data acq. the ether us or NHRA fuelers.
Now, I never said "your" traction control. I said if you want it "I" think
you or anyone should have it.
|