land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: 200 still

To: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>,
Subject: Re: Re: 200 still
From: Sparky <wmtsmith@landracing.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:55:16 -0500
Tom
The only reason there has be a proliferation--(a good word)is that the new 
technology made the old non-competitive--now if we didn't have all the new 
classes we wouldn't have to worry about min. -- we would just be breaking the 
old records  and there wouldn't be a six hour wait in line. 
Because who would want to try to make a H-D try to run A 'Busa---nearly same 
displacement--nearly 100 MPH. difference in speed.---wmts

PS if you really wanted to protect the integrity of the "EFFORT"  just don't 
let anyone bump their own record with the same car.  ---I wonder how many that 
would drop out 50-100????

> From: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
> Date: 2003/10/24 Fri PM 12:00:58 CDT
> To: John Beckett <saltracer@servusa.com>
> CC: Nt788@aol.com,  land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: 200 club still
> 
> John & Jack,
> 
> Of course, I am an American and I do believe in free speech and 
> differences of opinion. I don't intend to convince anyone of my point of 
> view, but I still see this as a necessary of leveling of the playing 
> field because of the proliferation of classes.
> 
> Tom, Redding CA - D/GCC - D/FCC
> 
> John Beckett wrote:
> >  List
> > Jack and I often have differing opinions on many subjects. However I hate to
> > bust everybodys bubble on this one, but jack is 110% correct.
> > JB #79, D/GCC
> > 
> > "Hi Tom I think minimums were invented not for fairness, but because with
> > all the functions trinkets,and all the other things that create the
> > infrastructure of a "club," it became overwhelming. To many members are a
> > problem! Same way with the "chapter" which glorifies the 2 club more than
> > the individual!.... "
> >  Jack
> 
> 

  "Sparky"
Lakester 2211





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>