fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [FOT] Reality check: Hybrid hype and HOV cutoff in 07

To: Scott Janzen <S.Janzen@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [FOT] Reality check: Hybrid hype and HOV cutoff in 07
From: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:47:13 -1000
If they were a step in the right direction then they would make  
economic sense. they are a fashion accessory for the holier-than-thou  
crowd.


On Jun 13, 2006, at 5:22 AM, Scott Janzen wrote:

> Interesting discussion as economically they absolutely don't make  
> sense. They are a step in the right direction from a resource  
> consumption standpoint, and eventually  better economies of  
> production and higher fuel prices will make this and other  
> solutions not only green, but the economical choice.  It always  
> interests me that so much effort is focused on our cars, while most  
> of us spend much more on energy costs each year for our houses.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Wensley"  
> <wensley@adelphia.net>
> To: "Bob Clark" <masinstr@earthlink.net>; "Alan Tucker"  
> <tuckstips@superpa.net>; "Alex Redding" <aredding@mail.com>;  
> "Andrea Wachtell" <andjoewach@adelphia.net>; "David Dague"  
> <ddague@innovectra.com>; "FOT (E-mail)" <fot@autox.team.net>; "Gary  
> Klein" <tr6guy@cablespeed.com>; "Geri Dixon" <geri10@verizon.net>;  
> "John Herrera" <jrherrera90@hotmail.com>; <LOddTR@aol.com>;  
> <lou1969g@aol.com>; "R. Ashford Little II" <70TR6@mindspring.com>;  
> "Rick Mead" <rcmpt@adelphia.net>; "Ron Dixon"  
> <rondix2@verizon.net>; "Ronald Dixon" <rdixon@hns.com>; "SHANE  
> Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>; "Ted Schumacher"  
> <tedtsimx@bright.net>; "Thomas Rowe" <tomsrowe@hotmail.com>; "Tom  
> Delaney" <redcarnut@aol.com>; "TRAC Members" <Trac-all@tracltd.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:24 AM
> Subject: [FOT] Reality check: Hybrid hype and HOV cutoff in 07
>
>
>> Reality check: Hybrid hype and HOV cutoff in 07
>>
>> Green Gap? Ha!!
>>
>> Here's the best excerpt --
>>
>> If you drive that hybrid 15,000 miles a year and pay $2.93 a  
>> gallon, it
>> will take you* 8.8 years* to see that payoff at the pump, [for the
>> Highlander hybrid vs regular Highlander] according to Edmunds. The  
>> wait
>> is even longer for the $31,540 Accord hybrid:* 12.6 years*. ...The
>> Accord's electric motor is geared to both boost power and save on  
>> gas.
>> The result: the four-door sedan gets an unspectacular 29.5mpg--just a
>> half mile per gallon better than a regular four-cylinder Accord. In
>> fact, if you compare the Accord hybrid to the regular four-cylinder
>> model, the payback takes* 296.2 years*, according to Edmunds. I'm  
>> sure
>> your great-great-great granddaughter will appreciate the savings.
>>
>> Hybrids might be hip, but are they saving consumers enough at the  
>> pump
>> to compensate for their high sticker price?
>>
>> _http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12958916/site/newsweek/from/ET/_
>>
>>
>> ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
>> ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
>
> ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
> ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>