fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE: Chevy 5.3 Litre Powered Tow Vehicle

To: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: RE: Chevy 5.3 Litre Powered Tow Vehicle
From: RKRAMER3@austin.rr.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:58:53 -0600
I'll ditto that. I just went from a 1500HD crew cab 4wd with the 6.0 liter down 
to an ext. cab 2wd 1500 with the 5.3 liter. I feel like I'm towing with a S10 
by comparison, and that is with a open trailer. I'm sure it's fine, but I 
wouldn't want to haul the 20' box.
Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:33 am
Subject: RE: Chevy 5.3 Litre Powered Tow Vehicle

> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Joe Curry wrote:
> 
> > I use an 2002 Avalanche with a 5.3 V8 and I can't even feel the 
> trailer> behind.  I get about 18 mpg towing.
> 
> I'll take a wild guess that you have an open trailer. The difference
> between an open trailer and an enclosed trailer is quite 
> substantial. I
> just bought a Pace 20 foot enclosed trailer and the empty weight 
> is a tad
> over 3000 pounds. That empty weight is equivalent my old open 
> trailer with
> the car on it.
> 
> I'm with the previous poster - more is more betterer when you pull an
> enclosed trailer. 5.3 liters is marginal, the 6.0 is better. 
> Diesel is the
> best (if you can lay out the cash.) Also note that gears will help 
> a lot
> (go for 3.73 or 4.10 on the GM products). The 4.10 gears will move 
> yourGCWR up a couple of thousand pounds.
> 
> > Joe (C)
> 
> Regards,
> rml
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Bob Lang              Room N42-140Q            |  This space for rent
> Consultant            MIT unix-vms-help        |
> Voice:617-253-7438    FAX: 617-258-9535        |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------

[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of 
RKRAMER3@austin.rr.com.vcf]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>