| To: | BillDentin@aol.com, WEmery7451@aol.com, twakeman@cruzers.com, |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lifter Hardness |
| From: | N197TR4@cs.com |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:20:17 EDT |
Matching hardness makes sense....gear hardness falls within a fairly narrow band of specification at 58-62 RC. I wonder also about the depth of hardening (case hardness) on lifters. Isnt Chuck Gee a metalurgist...Chuck? Joe (A) > Seems to me, there was also an opinion at the time that part of the problem > involved the fact that to work, all of the pieces needed to be of similar > hardness. One could not be hard and another soft, etc. It was felt this > was > a contributing factor. > > Bill |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Nominations, WEmery7451 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Race report, Mike Munson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lifter Hardness, BillDentin |
| Next by Thread: | Re:Re: Lifter Hardness, Joe Boruch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |