fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Triumph/MG Photo Framing

To: rem9@cornell.edu, owner-fot@autox.team.net, greenman62@hotmail.com,
Subject: Re: Re: Triumph/MG Photo Framing
From: TR3197@AOL.COM
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 10:23:23 EDT
Menard's has frame stock for 7-15 per ten foot length. I plan to use masonite 
backing and perhaps plexiglass.

Joe Alexander
In a message dated 7/27/99 1:04:14 AM, rem9@cornell.edu wrote:

<<The Spitfire Squadron, being noted as cheap weasels, makes their own, is it
any wonder, look at what we drive. Use a piece of 1/8' plexiglass cut at a
local hardware store (window quality) to the proper dimension.and use a
backer of luan plywood, trim the edge with a 3/4 round pine or oak piece of
trim stock from a local lumber yard. If you miter the corners and use brads
and glue on the assembly it gives nice square corners. The last one I did
cost about $8.15. (Oak will raise the price but I have used pine painted
black in the past with excellent results. At this point I have a number of
these from past events hanging in my home.
... $80.00 to me is half a race tire, unless of course your name is Donn
and you follow the formula Fords around!

Russ Moore

At 10:02 AM 7/26/99 PDT,  wrote:
>From what I know, the price seems about right for the size of the pix. 
>Framing can be expensive... to do it right. If you go cheap, you can have 
>your picture ruined in short order, the first time it gets humid. If the 
>"art" is precious to you go the expense to have it done right.
>
>Greg Petrolati
>
>
>>From: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>
>>Reply-To: "Roger Beasley" <beeline@iline.com>
>>To: <fot@autox.team.net>
>>Subject: Triumph/MG Photo Framing
>>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:54:20 -0400
>>
>>Amici,
>>
>>At the risk of sounding cheap, I wanted to ask about others' experience in
>>getting the 50"x10" panoramic photo from Mid-Ohio framed.
>>
>>The guy we use when we get frames made here for work just quoted me $80 to
>>have the photo put in a plain black aluminum frame with plain glass.  No
>>matting, nothing fancy.  Non-glare glass or lexan were even more.  I guess
>>I was expecting something less than the $45 I paid for the photo.
>>
>>How does that price compare with your experiences?  Did he see me coming or
>>is that "the rate"?
>>
>>Bye-the-way, the photo is great and never fails to impress.  It was a big
>>hit at last night's meeting of the British Car Club of SW Florida.
>>
>>Roger Beasley
>>'62 TR4 Vintage Racer
>
>
>


----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-fot@autox.team.net>
Received: from  aol.com (rly-yc01.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.33]) by 
air-yc01.mail.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:04:14 -0400
Received: from  triumph.cs.utah.edu (triumph.cs.utah.edu [155.99.188.52]) by 
rly-yc01.mx.aol.com (v60.18) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:04:04 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
    by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA07138
    for fot-outbound; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 14:03:06 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19990726160258.006c8f34@postoffice4.mail.cornell.edu>
X-Sender: rem9@postoffice4.mail.cornell.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.2 (32) -- [Cornell Modified]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:02:58 -0400
To: "" <greenman62@hotmail.com>, beeline@iline.com, fot@autox.team.net
From: Russ Moore <rem9@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Triumph/MG Photo Framing
In-Reply-To: <19990726170237.12420.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-fot@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Russ Moore <rem9@cornell.edu>

>>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Re: Triumph/MG Photo Framing, TR3197 <=