datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

cars that are BUILT like roadsters... (enough double clutching already!)

To: a roadster list <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Subject: cars that are BUILT like roadsters... (enough double clutching already!)
From: Toby B <toby@wolfenet.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:45:54 -0700
This is possible,
          But BMW also "borrowed" the design of their synchros from Porsche for
a while, then switched over to the toothed Borg Warner style. (they also
borrowed the TR4A rear end, just like the 510)  The BMW 1600's and
2000's didn't survive emissions in 1968 (and became the 2002).  While
the 2002 trannies are similar in design to the B-W style Datsun, they're
different dimensionally.  
        Amusingly, the 2nd gear synchro is fine on the roadster, but craaaaap
on the 2002.  So I sometimes double-clutch when downshifting, but I have
to stutter-clutch on the upshift <GRIN!> 
        Also different are the Porsche synchros, which is a shame since the
Porsche parts are 1/3 the cost of Nissan!  Whoda thunk?  Us, with a more
rare, more EXCLUSIVE and more expensive car than a Porsche.  Wow.  Now
if the 1600 would just GO like a 911 SC...
Toby

Richard B. Chianese wrote:
> Incidentally, it would appear that Datsun engineers were smart enough
> NOT to use British transmission designs.  They "borrowed" a lot of
> transmission technology from BMW.  Folks who raced BMW 1600s and 2000
> sedans told me that they could use PL510 gears in their transmissions
> with no modifications at less than a quarter of the cost.  (I have never
> been able to verify this.)
> 
> Rick Chianese

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • cars that are BUILT like roadsters... (enough double clutching already!), Toby B <=