| To: | mg-dennis@mindspring.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Gonkulators for MGs? |
| From: | Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:45:39 -0700 |
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 08:18:20PM -0700, mg-dennis@mindspring.com wrote:
> So does the gonkulator require the use of a catastrophic contorter?
No, but a contorter could increase performance by up to 23.47% versus
an uncontorted gonkulator. However, if you use an aluminum rather than
a brass contorter, it could lead to catastrophic failure at the
third resonant harmonic.
--
Girling is not a verb.
lrc@red4est.com http://www.red4est.com/lrc
/// british-cars@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: another commute/dinner run Redwood City -- July 24th, Larry Colen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Gonkulators for MGs?, Diane and Roland Dudley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Gonkulators for MGs?, ARoman4047 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Gonkulators for MGs?, Diane and Roland Dudley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |