Well, a little of both of those. You're right, and thats my point. The
SC just doesn't have to do anything on either of them. No formal action
is required-in fact, no formal action is appropriate; it doesn't have to
respond at all.
tony
Charlie Davis wrote:
> I'm not sure which part Tony is referencing.
>
> If it is regarding Chrles Cox, we can easily wait
> until he comes to an event, is too loud, gets DSQed
> the 2nd time, and files a protest against the Sound
> Chief, or appeals the decision to the SC, both of
> which are options he has in the Solo Rule Book. Until
> then, he's a non-participant.
>
> If he's referring to the OSP competitor who inquired
> about protesting another OSP competitor who is too
> loud, such a protest would not be accepted. A protest
> against a vehicle has to be lodged based on the
> vehicle's configuration or specs with respect to the
> rules. In OSP, he can protest 2 things: 1) that the
> car was never registered for the street, 2) that it
> didn't compete on DOT legal tires
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss an email again!
> Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
|