ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: How accurate are our timers?

To: rbrown7@covad.net
Subject: RE: How accurate are our timers?
From: Steffan Thomas <duomaxwell@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:53:00 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
from:
www ieee-uffc org/freqcontrol/quartz/vig/vigcateg htm  (add your own periods)

A crystal unit's resonance frequency varies with temperature. Typical frequency 
vs. temperature (f vs. T) characteristics for crystals used in frequency 
standards are shown in Figure 11. The three categories of crystal oscillators, 
based on the method of dealing with the crystal unit's f vs. T characteristic 
are XO, TCXO, and OCXO, (see Figure 12). A simple XO does not contain means for 
reducing the crystal's f vs. T variation. A typical XO's f vs. T stability may 
be 125 ppm for a temperature range of -550C to +850C. 

My $.02:
unless our timers are substantially more temperature dependent than "a typical 
XO," then the 3rd digit should be reliable.  For a 50 second run, 25ppm 
=0.00125 sec.  So, if one person runs when the crystal of the timer is at -55, 
and the other runs at +85, the timer is going to shift 1 thousandth.  Since 
more likely temperature variations over an event are 10 to 35 (50 to 95 deg F), 
the variation is pretty likely to be .05ppm.  (1/5 the temp range, 1/5 the 
variation)

(yes, I know that a hyperbola isn't a straight line, but for the area around 0, 
we can approximate it as such.)

Since most runs of a class are done at the same time of day, the temperature 
variation will be minimized.  Small local temp differences (a cloud passing 
over the sun, etc.) should be handled by the insulation effect caused by the 
timer casing.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>