ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New rule??????

To: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
Subject: Re: New rule??????
From: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Rich Urschel wrote:

> Pat Kelly wrote:
>
> > Ray,
> >         In theory, it's the responsibility for a competitor to correctly
> > classify his/her car.
>
> In theory, the competitor is supposed to have the correct
> class on their car and tech inspection is supposed to check
> it.

Nope.

3.3.3 ..."Safety inspection is not concerned with the legality of a car.
The organizing Region may at its discretion provide an advisory inspection
for vehicle classification and legality, in connection with technical
inspection."

I don't believe SFR provides this advisory inspection, certainly not
formally.  Implicit in a tech-on-grid procedure is that an absolute
minimum of cars will be failed in tech, due to the parking issues.

KeS

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>