autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Shock adjustment access rule

To: <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
Subject: Re: Shock adjustment access rule
From: "Bruce Wentzel" <greendotracing@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:47:53 -0400
You're absolutely right. I've got to learn to think outside the box.
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>
To: Bruce Wentzel <greendotracing@netzero.net>
Cc: <TeamZ06@aol.com>; <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>; <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Shock adjustment access rule


> I'd call the engine compartment the interior of the car - sounds more
> appropriate than calling it the exterior, doesn't it?
>
> KeS
>
> (who doesn't agree with the rule in the first place, but that's a moot
> point since it's a done deal now)
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Bruce Wentzel wrote:
>
> > jeez Mark, I didn't read any ulterior motives into Larry's comment.
> >
> > I might have not been paying enough attention when this first was
proposed,
> > but it has limited value in the approved wording as it overlooks lots of
> > same situation applications with the inclusion of the word "interior".
> > I thought that I was going to gain access to my basic Koni single
adjustable
> > on the front of my C4 when I first saw the proposal, but not with this
> > wording, unless the interior of the engine compartment is a viable
> > interpretation :-).
> >
> > So I see the new rule as a short sighted "fix".
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <TeamZ06@aol.com>
> > To: <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com>
> > Cc: <autox@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: Shock adjustment access rule
> >
> >
> > > In a message dated 9/17/01 12:28:26 PM Central Daylight Time,
> > > lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > The allowance has just been passed and already the can of worms has
> > already
> > > > been opened.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Larry,
> > >
> > > Don't you wish, but I'm afraid it won't serve your "anti-aftermarket
> > shock"
> > > position as well as you'd like.  The truth is the ruling allows a
> > competitor
> > > to provide access to shock absorber adjusters as required so long as
it
> > > serves no other ulterior purpose.
> > >
> > > Just because someone doesn't understand the general concept does not
> > quality
> > > as a can of worms.  Unfortunately I have not had time to counter
several
> > of
> > > your other misrepresentations on this subject as appeared in NAP
recently.
> > >
> > > Mark Sipe
> > >
> > > ///          autox@autox.team.net mailing list
> > > ///
> > > ///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to
majordomo@autox.team.net
> > > ///  with nothing in it but
> > > ///
> > > ///     unsubscribe autox
> > > ///
> > > ///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> > > ///
> > Only $9.95 per month!
> > Sign up in September to win one of 30 Hawaiian Vacations for 2!
> >
> > ///          autox@autox.team.net mailing list
> > ///
> > ///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to
majordomo@autox.team.net
> > ///  with nothing in it but
> > ///
> > ///     unsubscribe autox
> > ///
> > ///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> > ///
Only $9.95 per month!
Sign up in September to win one of 30 Hawaiian Vacations for 2!

///          autox@autox.team.net mailing list
///
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe autox
///
///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>