Phillip,
Huh? Gosh, I didn't know that was what I was implying.
But hey, if you're going to put words in my mouth, at least they were
cookies! Thanks! Yum!
Regards,
William Loring
> From: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
> Subject: Re: Speed Creep/cookie cutter courses
>
> So, what we need is "cookie cutter" courses...
>
> Let's have the top course designers (relative term) across the country
> prepare a manual with perhaps 10 course designs (the average number of
> events a region hosts per year) and make them of average size, (another
> relative term), and keep the speeds within the limit's of the rules (more
> relative stuff, nothing absolute) and safety designed by committee,
> regardless of site location, site size, site obstructions, site runoff,
> etc., and let each region use this as their bible. No more, no less. It
> shouldn't matter if we have a small congested lot, or a large un-obstructed
> lot. One size fits all.....Just think of all the fun we could have, and how
> well the sport would grow...Why, I bet after a couple of years of that, we
> could have 1500/2000 at National, no problem....Not to mention all the
> record breaking attendance at regional, divisional, and national tours. Who
> needs diversity?....
>
> Phil O.
|