autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: STS Tire Rules

To: "Team.Net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: STS Tire Rules
From: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:35:45 -0400 (EDT)
Howdy,

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Jay Mitchell wrote:
> OK, which one IS it, then?:
> 
> 1. Is the purpose of STS to attract "new" autoxers? There's no
> need whatever for it to be a Nationals class to serve this
> purpose. Just leave it in the rulebook as a Regional class.
> 
> 2. Is it there to provide a new place for _existing_ autoxers to
> play? Then I say it should be held to the same standard that was
> applied in the creation of Street Prepared: let it operate at the
> Regional level for a few years, expand it to include more than
> one class - it IS a new Category after all, having its own unique
> prep allowances - THEN see if it can fly at Nationals.

Outta curiosity, why can't it be both?  As you say, lots of old blood are
in the class at Nationals.  At every local region I've heard about, lots
of new blood is coming in.  Why is that a problem?

> If your answer is 1. above, then you should be content to see
> "all the new blood" at the local level and not concern yourself
> with National status for STS. In fact, that will quickly become
> self-defeating, as the presence of experienced autoxers in the
> class will tend to discourage newcomers.

Really?  And here I thought that providing a class with rules that fit
what they wanted to do, along with encouraging them to come out an compete
were some of the primary motivators.  I wasn't aware that all STS
competitors couldn't handle getting beaten.

I know!  Perhaps all those old blood national drivers don't compete in
their local regions!  _That_ must be why STS is doing well on a regional
level as well as the nation scene!  

:-)

> The offensive practice of calling someone who disagrees with you
> "closed-minded" is nothing new on team.net - we've seen that
> tactic used to defend all sorts of ideas that ultimately didn't
> work out - but it does little to further your argument. I suggest
> you stick with discussing the actual issues. I'll continue to do
> likewise.

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that expressing my opinion that you're being
close minded on this issue wasn't allowed during the discussion.  I'll
certainly be careful to not express any of my opinions from now on.  I'll
stick to the "actual issues".  'Cause lord knows that autoxers not wanting
to see anything different happen can't possibly be an "issue".

Mark


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>