Wow! 202? You should know way better than to get involved in the rants on
Team.bent ;-)
I have no idea what my IQ is. But an ablity to score well on monocultural
and commerce biased tests can only be equated with "intelligence" or "wits"
tangentially at best. To suggest otherwise would court the reductio ad
absurdum of that which constitutes "intelligence".
Obligatory autocross content:
How about those Nationals courses! (I liked the south course- fast and
rhythmic. I thought the north course was one twisted kitty- "the math
test" as one wag called it. Then again, I did have to run the tighter
quick fix pot-hole aversion version on Tuesday... I'm sure it was better
in original form.)
Rich
John Moore wrote:
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:12:42 -0500
From: "Moore, John" <jmoore@opentv.com>
Subject: RE: Enough already with the attacks
Excuse me? personal attacks now? Dim-wit? I'll have you know that I
was an honor student, had a 4.0 average (out of 4.0) in my major in college
and have a Masters degree in computer science and an associates degree in
Architecture. I am highly educated. I am no dim-wit. Last I.Q. test I was
given I scored 202. I grew up dealing with gang wars, being shot at, knifed,
and beaten. I have street smarts well beyond what most people see.
And yes, dim-wit is name calling. And note, if those few of you want
to keep up your silly attacks, go create a news group or chat room or
something and do it there where I wont have to defend myself.
John Moore
|