| To: | "\"'<washburn@dwave.net>'\" <"<washburn@dwave.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes) | 
| From: | Engstrom <engstrom@onramp.net> | 
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:34:41 -0500 | 
Pat Washburn wrote: > I wish I could have a lot less static negative camber on my Neon. It > just causes poor acceleration and braking traction IMO. (See my small > pile of front tires with the inside edge worn to the cord) I would trade > static neg camber for a better dynamic camber geometry any day! > > Pat Pat, you really shouldn't feel bad. The -1 degree of static camber and 7 degrees of caster I have on my car is really overrated....really, I wouldn't lie to you. ;-) John "Mod cars - lots of adjustments to really mess things up" Engstrom  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Appearances, Scot Zediker | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hoosier Tire Splits + rim protectors?, TeamZ3 | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), washburn | 
| Next by Thread: | Curt Ormiston needs SS ride at Wendover, A4autox | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |