| To: | Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>, autox@autox.team.net, werace4u@aol.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea | 
| From: | dg50@daimlerchrysler.com | 
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:16:08 -0400 | 
Points noted from several sources - OK, 2.5 is too small for OHC motors. 3.2 is
too big. So
 STU displacement limits are as follows:
    - for overhead camshaft engines  - 3.000 litres
    - for pushrod valvetrain engines - 4.000 litres
    - for rotory (wankel) engines    - 1.500 litres
> Rotaries, most commonly the mazdas are all likely to be 2 rotor 13b
> motors anyhow.
Does "13b" mean "1.3 litres"?
> Do you have any idea how expensive a japanese 3 rotor
> motor is? Yoiks.
How big is it? Is 1.5 too small to allow them?
DG
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: drag racin' fun, Tommy Regan | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea, Steven N. Burkett | 
| Previous by Thread: | STU Displacement Limit - An Idea, dg50 | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea, Steven N. Burkett | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |