autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Removable Rearview

To: "'dg50@daimlerchrysler.com'" <dg50@daimlerchrysler.com>,
Subject: RE: Removable Rearview
From: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 08:00:27 -0700
It stuck me as being odd, but ive endured the party-line 'sorry, rules'
responses so far.

A couple of ppl in here have expressed private humor in this, and they are
on the list of privileged humans who may remove mirrors when the home planet
comes to rule, coz I wont argue 'bout it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com [SMTP:dg50@daimlerchrysler.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 8:47 AM
> To:   autox@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Removable Rearview
> 
> Doesn't it strike anyone as odd that we would have a rule in place that
> prohibits the improvement of _visibility out of the car_?
> 
> "Gee, I'm sorry I ran over that corner worker franticly waving that red
> flag and
> subsequently plowed into that stopped car, but I couldn't see him - the
> mirror
> was in the way. But my car was legal!"
> 
> Yeesh.
> 
> DG
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>