- 1. [oletrucks] Mixed emotions about clunker type laws (score: 1)
- Author: Passnb4U@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:34:28 EST
- First of all, I'm not an enviromental looney. But I have noticed some replys to the subjects that have me concerned. I don't wish anybody or any institution to take away my hobby based on the year of
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00833.html (8,758 bytes)
- 2. RE: [oletrucks] Mixed emotions about clunker type laws (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:07:55 -0800
- If the legislators want to pick somebody for clean air, start with regulating the industry in their areas. Oregon has a lot of logging industry. Logging, from what I know, is relatively harmless; how
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00843.html (9,882 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] Mixed emotions about clunker type laws (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raphael" <draphael@teleport.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:43:15 -0800
- I have mixed emotions about this discussion -- both for the reasons Mike cited, plus my own. First, I appreciated being alerted to the draft Oregon legislation and read the draft language. But, I'm n
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00848.html (8,521 bytes)
- 4. RE: [oletrucks] Mixed emotions about clunker type laws (score: 1)
- Author: "Andrew Thor" <AndrewThor@email.msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:06:46 -0600
- That is an interesting point about keeping your vehicle in tune. Most folks thought I was crazy when I installed a Charcoal canister in my truck to trap the gas fumes from the float bowl of the carb.
- /html/oletrucks/1999-03/msg00849.html (10,404 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu