Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wet\s+underwear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*wet\s+underwear\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. wet underwear (score: 1): Author: Gonridn2@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:10:14 EDT; Both arguments are valid, they are just different arguments. Wet cloth ignites less rapidly than dry (but it feels better). BUT we are not talking about underwear ignition since it is under a firepro; /html/vintage-race/2002-08/msg00159.html (7,278 bytes)
2. Re: wet underwear (score: 1): Author: Tombread@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:54:05 EDT; In any case, the fabric doesn't ignite. It's a matter of heat transferal. Nomex or similar is a barrier and an insulator. You can cook Nomex to death and all it does is become more charred, but it wi; /html/vintage-race/2002-08/msg00160.html (7,444 bytes)
3. Re: wet underwear (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:41:03 -0400; Dry material is more comfortable, cooler, and warmer than wet material! Yes, a lap full of ice will be cooling, until it all melts and the water reaches body temperature. Then it traps heat. Nomex is; /html/vintage-race/2002-08/msg00164.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]