- 1. no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Cobine" <mcobine@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:05:23 -0400
- Am I the only one that isn't getting any of these attachments? I keep getting the following message instead. [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of A
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00043.html (7,800 bytes)
- 2. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Snover <rsnover@toyshop-resto.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:59:23 -0700
- That's because the list server doesn't pass attachments.
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00045.html (8,032 bytes)
- 3. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Irv Korey <emanteno@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:19:39 -0500
- All attachments are automatically removed from all team.net served lists. If you want someone to receive an attachment, you must send it directly to the recipient. Irv
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00046.html (8,152 bytes)
- 4. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: JWoesvra@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:22:12 EDT
- << That's because the list server doesn't pass attachments. >> Why? It used to didn't it? Jack Woehrle
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00049.html (7,618 bytes)
- 5. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Cobine" <mcobine@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:11:17 -0400
- Thanks all for the answer. It is understandable in that most lists don't, but with so many sending attachments over the last several months and people acting like it was normal, I just wanted to chec
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00050.html (8,425 bytes)
- 6. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Snover <rsnover@toyshop-resto.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:50:22 -0700
- Not as far as I know. I don't remember ever receiving an attachment from any team.net list. If you got an attachment you must've been individually named among the addressees. Rick
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00052.html (7,915 bytes)
- 7. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: JWoesvra@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:17:35 EDT
- << If you got an attachment you must've been individually named among the addressees. OK, but I've sent a few and thought people got them. jw
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00053.html (7,611 bytes)
- 8. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Snover <rsnover@toyshop-resto.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:31:42 -0700
- That is a drawback. The list server doesn't tell the originator that their attachment's been discarded. At least the text of the message gets to the list, unlike what happens if you accidentally send
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00054.html (8,088 bytes)
- 9. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Snover <rsnover@toyshop-resto.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 07:47:11 -0700
- I got curious and dug out the welcome message I received when I re-joined the list after spending my last vacation taking the digest version: It DOESN'T actually come out and say "no attachments allo
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00055.html (8,898 bytes)
- 10. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: Roger Garnett <rwg@autox.team.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:47:37 -0400
- There are several reasons for no attachments on Team.net lists - they include -size of message - some folks have limited size mailboxes, which start bouncing when they get full. Others on modems don'
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00065.html (8,663 bytes)
- 11. Re: no attachments in any messages (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Cobine" <mcobine@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:03:23 -0400
- It isn't that I was asking WHY, but IF. I've been on email lists for 11 years and fully appreciate what goes into making them smooth. The intro However, it seemed like there were several sending atta
- /html/vintage-race/2001-06/msg00068.html (8,895 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu