Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+rules\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: SCCA rules (score: 1)
Author: "Peter L. Krause" <pkrause@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:09:10 -0400
Good question, Mr. Kramer! First off, those who suggested they were legal "back in the day" are partially correct. For FIA International events (Sebring, Daytona, 1000KM Sports Car events, IMSA), the
/html/vintage-race/2003-10/msg00009.html (8,947 bytes)

2. Re: SCCA rules (score: 1)
Author: JWoesvra@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:02:51 EDT
To add some insight to this issue, the Spitfire/GT6 shock always was a rudimentary "coil over" design. It just did not have an adjustable threaded perch. It has always been permitted to add spacers o
/html/vintage-race/2003-10/msg00010.html (8,043 bytes)

3. RE: SCCA rules (score: 1)
Author: "Peter L. Krause" <pkrause@attglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 06:55:02 -0400
I love this "woulda, coulda, shoulda" about the Production car rules. In the real world, it's not that important, but for those who research "a snapshot in time", it is! Productions and sedan rules a
/html/vintage-race/2003-10/msg00026.html (8,152 bytes)

4. SCCA rules (score: 1)
Author: "rodgers356" <rodgers356@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 10:26:46 -0800
This got me to thinking. I was watching the runoffs and was wondering what the rules were for the GT classes. I know the basics; that they're tube framed race cars which resemble, more-or-less, real
/html/vintage-race/2001-12/msg00151.html (6,930 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu