Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roller\s+rockers\,\s+etc\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Edwin Smith" <EHSMITH@us.oracle.com>
Date: 18 Jan 99 16:06:17 -0800
Peter: Your message is right on!!! I have 3 vintage cars, all period prepped, 2 with period history. Two are productions cars and one is a FJr. There are 3 orgs to run with in N. Calif.; HMSA, CSRG a
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00130.html (9,338 bytes)

2. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Simon Favre <simon@mondes.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:30:21 -0600
Ted Smith makes some good points about inspection, just wanting to have a good place to run an authentic car, etc. In comparing CSRG and HMSA, there are a few caveats to keep in mind. I also race wit
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00132.html (9,536 bytes)

3. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Nick Nicholson" <nicknich@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:19:53 -0800
prepped, 2 with period history. Two are productions cars and one is a FJr. There are 3 orgs to run with in N. Calif.; HMSA, CSRG and SCCA vintage. I prefer to run with other period correct cars as t
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00134.html (9,799 bytes)

4. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:39:33 -0800
OK, I'll pipe in with a few boneheaded questions, I'm a rookie, so please go easy on me.... I'll first say that I understand completely the motive of vintage racing to keep things in accordance with
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00138.html (8,433 bytes)

5. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:34:49 -0800
A very god point, but... Then by association, wouldn't synthetic lubricants and breakerless ignitions fall into the same category? Maybe not to the same extent as rollers, but it is something to con
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00139.html (8,491 bytes)

6. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Simon Favre <simon@mondes.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:16:06 -0600
See my $0.02 worth below... Aw, shucks. No roasted rookie for lunch. ;=) Afraid so. The roller rockers (and roller cams) allow the motor to turn a lot more RPMs without becoming a grinding mill for o
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00140.html (10,238 bytes)

7. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:14:41 -0800
That's a great explaination. Rookie curiosity satisfied! Andy "Anybody Wanna Paint My Car?" Ramm '67 MGBGT still no paint, still no roller rockers.
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00143.html (11,099 bytes)

8. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: Tom M <tmatycho@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:57:11 -0800
It's my understanding that it's not really the CSRG tech guys' job to determine if the car conforms to the rules. It's more for safety. CSRG has tried to be a user-friendly club, but they do try to d
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00144.html (7,585 bytes)

9. Re: Roller rockers, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Edwin Smith" <EHSMITH@us.oracle.com>
Date: 20 Jan 99 08:39:25 -0800
--=_ORCL_12358775_0_0 Andy, I think the bottom line issue is that safety, reliability improvement= s are generally ok as long as they don't significantly impact performance...= ....it gets a bit grey
/html/vintage-race/1999-01/msg00152.html (10,216 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu