- 1. Head and Neck Safety Devices - My opinion (score: 1)
- Author: <Don@theunion.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:49:35 -0700
- I suppose it's heresy to speak against this idea, but any club that requires a HANS device won't get my business. The cure out weighs the problem by ten. Why not require a speed limit or restrict pas
- /html/vintage-race/2005-10/msg00037.html (7,369 bytes)
- 2. Re: Head and Neck Safety Devices - My opinion (score: 1)
- Author: MHKitchen@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:45:44 EDT
- This is a dangerous sport. I accept that. No more rules please. Don: I don't think anyone was proposing this be a rule. Its simply a recommendation you can choose to do, or not. Myles
- /html/vintage-race/2005-10/msg00039.html (7,162 bytes)
- 3. Re: Head and Neck Safety Devices - My opinion (score: 1)
- Author: WMW79@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:55:16 EDT
- I'm with you, Don. VARA for example, adds a rule every year, without any history of a problem, requiring another piece of equipment. In ten years time there will be nothing left to do but require eve
- /html/vintage-race/2005-10/msg00040.html (7,095 bytes)
- 4. Re: Head and Neck Safety Devices - My opinion (score: 1)
- Author: "Vaughn Rockney" <lists@vintagegarage.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:05:40 -0400
- If the proposed HSR rule changes for 2006 become firm, Snell 2000 helmets will be required next year, and head and neck restraints will become mandatory for many race groups in 2006, and all groups
- /html/vintage-race/2005-10/msg00047.html (8,513 bytes)
- 5. Re: Head and Neck Safety Devices - My opinion (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl McLelland" <carlynneracing@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:01:58 -0700
- Ed Swart (HSR-West) printed in the last newsletter and mentioned it at drivers meeting at Willow Springs two weeks ago that Snell 2000 helmets would be required in 2006. While strongly recommended I
- /html/vintage-race/2005-10/msg00049.html (7,813 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu