Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Allowable\s+Exceptions\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Allowable\s+Exceptions\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: MHKitchen@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:34:29 EDT; To add to your thread on this..and perhaps to the confusion... I, for one, favor practicality, safety, reliability, and operating cost impact over originality, and believe that acceptance adjustment; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00110.html (9,372 bytes)
2. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:01:39 EDT; I haven't looked lately, but I am not sure that other technology aimed at keeping the oily bits on the inside of the engine would have been allowed by the period SCCA rules. Specifically, Accusumps,; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00111.html (8,060 bytes)
3. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Palmer" <mgvrmark@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:53:56 +0000; MYLES, I agree 100% ... the SCCA GCR's were never intended to be used for "vintage racing" 30 or 40 years after they were written. They were intended to apply to relatively contemporary vehicles, wi; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00114.html (8,847 bytes)
4. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: Doug Meis <s800racer@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:08:30 -0500; Doug: To add to your thread on this..and perhaps to the confusion... I, for one, favor practicality, safety, reliability, and operating cost impact over originality, and believe that acceptance adjus; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00119.html (10,123 bytes)
5. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: Nicholas Froome <listreader@pvision.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:56:09 +0100; This raises a very good point. If no "original" parts exist (eg NOS) then a replacement must be allowed - else the car ceases to race Logically, then, all historic cars would eventually cease racing; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00126.html (8,994 bytes)
6. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 19:49:04 EDT; I think that this is the rationale for the use of larger than 2 litre engines in 911s - they are hard to find. I think hard to find is relative - many rarer cars had fewer engines made than you can f; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00128.html (9,106 bytes)
7. Re: Allowable Exceptions? (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 19:52:03 EDT; Nick, We actually have a rudimentary version of this concept in place. The problem is that since the USA is so large and diverse, we have regional differences that keep us from a common standard. We; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00129.html (8,303 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]