Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*should\s+I\?\s+87\s+mm\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 06:10:25 EDT
Anyone have compelling reasons not to upgrade to 87mm piston/liner set. I've got my engine broken down and was planning to bore all my liners and install .020 oversize pistons as the cheapest way to
/html/triumphs/1999-04/msg00969.html (6,575 bytes)

2. Re: should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:11:34 EDT
<< Anyone have compelling reasons not to upgrade to 87mm piston/liner set. I've got my engine broken down and was planning to bore all my liners and install .020 oversize pistons as the cheapest way
/html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01009.html (7,322 bytes)

3. Re: should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 99 10:24:02 +0100
I had 87mm pistons in my 54 TR2,didn't realise I had until I went to rebuild the engine years latter.It did explain why my car was always a little faster than the others when we travelled in convoy.
/html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01017.html (7,155 bytes)

4. should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:03:04 -0500
Carl, I recently overhauled my "TR4 in a TR3" engine and went to the 87mm pistons. I noticed a big improvement in performance, due in no small part to the increased displacement. I was warned about
/html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01032.html (7,783 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu