- 1. should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 06:10:25 EDT
- Anyone have compelling reasons not to upgrade to 87mm piston/liner set. I've got my engine broken down and was planning to bore all my liners and install .020 oversize pistons as the cheapest way to
- /html/triumphs/1999-04/msg00969.html (6,575 bytes)
- 2. Re: should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:11:34 EDT
- << Anyone have compelling reasons not to upgrade to 87mm piston/liner set. I've got my engine broken down and was planning to bore all my liners and install .020 oversize pistons as the cheapest way
- /html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01009.html (7,322 bytes)
- 3. Re: should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 99 10:24:02 +0100
- I had 87mm pistons in my 54 TR2,didn't realise I had until I went to rebuild the engine years latter.It did explain why my car was always a little faster than the others when we travelled in convoy.
- /html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01017.html (7,155 bytes)
- 4. should I? 87 mm? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:03:04 -0500
- Carl, I recently overhauled my "TR4 in a TR3" engine and went to the 87mm pistons. I noticed a big improvement in performance, due in no small part to the increased displacement. I was warned about
- /html/triumphs/1999-04/msg01032.html (7,783 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu