- 1. observation (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:39:47 -0400
- I unsubscribed from the list over the holidays and went over to the digest in order to keep the pile manageable. In looking through the most recent digest, I discovered that I missed the latest slagg
- /html/triumphs/2000-01/msg00150.html (6,253 bytes)
- 2. Observation (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 14:45:03 -0400
- It occurs to me, as I look at all the posts on this list, that we collectively know more about Triumphs than the group that designed and built the cars. There are people here that can supply an answe
- /html/triumphs/1997-04/msg00433.html (6,498 bytes)
- 3. Re: Observation (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 22:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
- I think you may be right., except , that givin the computer and a net like this the factory boys, may be able to bull their way thru as well or better than most. I'm sure we could of all helped emen
- /html/triumphs/1997-04/msg00454.html (6,384 bytes)
- 4. Re: Observation (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 23:57:53 +0100
- Having recently enjoyed an evening with "Ted Marchant" (ex Triumph Development Engineer in the 60's) and listened to his tales of the tortuitious routes they used to design "our" cars I think it is w
- /html/triumphs/1997-04/msg00510.html (7,595 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu