- 1. Re: V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:51:34 EST
- "Engine swapping is such a personal thing. Every time I see Barry Schwartz hop out of his V6-Spitfire, I could swear I am speaking with the Cheshire Cat his grin is so big. If the engine transplant i
- /html/triumphs/1998-02/msg00083.html (6,824 bytes)
- 2. V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 18:53:31 PST
- IMHO, the Rover V8 is the only logical choice for our cars. It is (a LOT) lighter than the six, close to the fours in fact, and the five speed is a straight fit (to the engine anyway), or GM slushbo
- /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg02103.html (6,708 bytes)
- 3. Re: V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 11:05:12 EST
- Scott, While I won't argue with you that the Rover is a good choice, I will argue that it's not the only choice, nor the only logical choice, nor even the best choice. I will agree that the Chevy is
- /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg02123.html (9,384 bytes)
- 4. Re: V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 98 10:03:46 PST
- argue the best I'll have to agree with Dan here. The choice to insert a V8 into a Triumph has got to be for one goal only; hp and torque. While there may be case for the Rover motor (heritage), and t
- /html/triumphs/1998-01/msg02130.html (7,676 bytes)
- 5. Re: V8s (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 97 17:31:52 PDT
- Sorry to bomb the list. Someone wrote to me privately asking what other American V8s I considered good designs, and regretably, I deleted the message by mistake. Could that person write to me again,
- /html/triumphs/1997-10/msg01073.html (6,052 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu