Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Long\s+stroke\s+vs\s+Torque\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Long\s+stroke\s+vs\s+Torque\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Long stroke vs Torque. (score: 1): Author: CTDreher@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:26:53 -0500; A question showed up awhile ago, asking why long-stroke motors produce more torque. The answer that was posted talked about the lever-arm advantage a long-stoke has. Sorry, but that is all balderdash; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00773.html (8,534 bytes)
2. RE: Long stroke vs Torque. (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:53:13 -0700; I don't get this part. Can you explain why the long stroke engine would produce higher intake velocity? Since both engines would have the same displacement it seems they would "want" to pump the same; /html/triumphs/1995-11/msg00799.html (7,007 bytes)
3. Re: Long stroke vs Torque. (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:54:26 -0700; I liked the "leverage of the crank" idea. I had never thought of this before and thought it explained the situation well. On the other hand I think your explanation is the "balderdash". If you have a; /html/triumphs/1995-12/msg00001.html (10,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]