Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*In\s+defense\s+of\s+ZS\s+carbs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*In\s+defense\s+of\s+ZS\s+carbs\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 10:52:33 -0400; If you understand the principle of a carburetor, then look at the description of a constant-depression carb such as the ZS and SU, you will conclude, as I did, that they are ingenious devices indeed.; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00525.html (7,165 bytes)
2. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 12:24:27 -0700; < snip > ** And terribly simple. I agree with all the above although there is one inherent design flaw. It has to do with the jet/needle and the way it operates. With a needle sliding inside a jet yo; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00537.html (7,922 bytes)
3. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:21:33 EST; Phil - I agree that the basic design is OK...and I already told Odd Hedberg that most of the problems were caused by Fed emissions requirements...but that was getting in to a political argument agai; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00538.html (8,639 bytes)
4. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 14:53:45 -0500 (EST); I can understand your point that Webers are better if you're referring to mechanical flaws in ZS's, causing them to wear out faster than they should. However, everyone seems to think Webers give engi; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00542.html (7,812 bytes)
5. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 14:05:24 -0700; Having recently undergone Colorado emmissions testing with the Weber DGVs for the first time, I was suprised (and pleased) to find that the car actually runs cleaner with the Webers. I got a reading; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00547.html (8,678 bytes)
6. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 16:36:16 -0400; Not to pick on the DGV, but it's a very mild carb. It's a nice carb actually, but when talking of high performance Weber carbs I think most people think of DCOEs... The DGV is a nice drivable well bu; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00551.html (7,837 bytes)
7. Re: In defense of ZS carbs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 14:46:58 -0700; Agreed that the DGVs are not high performance carbs (they didn't hurt performance either!). The point I wanted to make is that the Weber DGVs which are not burdened with emissions stuff run cleaner t; /html/triumphs/1997-08/msg00556.html (7,949 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]