Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+Rotoflex\s+good\s+or\s+bad\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT6\s+Rotoflex\s+good\s+or\s+bad\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. GT6 Rotoflex good or bad? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 13:34:20 +0000; Just a thought going on with all this GT6 talk. What is the general feeling on Rotoflex. My 73 GT6 does not have it. Was it considered a weakness or good for handling? I was kinda glad my car didn't; /html/triumphs/1998-07/msg01699.html (6,582 bytes)
2. Re: GT6 Rotoflex good or bad? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 10:42:44 -0700; ** No, actually it was an improvement and made for a better handling car, with a much improved ride. the main reason for it's demise, as with many good improvements was cost. It was more expensive t; /html/triumphs/1998-07/msg01700.html (7,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]